Tonight sees the announcement of this year's winner of the Booker Prize for fiction: you can find out more about the shortlist here as well as interviews with the authors here. And you can watch the announcment on follow the Booker livestream here.
Even more excitingly, for the first time ever, we've managed to schedule our annual 'Predict the Booker Prize' event for the very same evening as the real thing. For those of you unfamiliar with 'Predict the Booker', it's a bit like a balloon debate. But with books. Six books, six readers, five minutes each: our Pauline readers present each of the shortlisted nominations before the audience votes for the one that the SPS community thinks should win this year's prestigious Booker Prize.
We'll be reporting on that event later in the week, but meanwhile, today's post. After Donald Trump's first election victory in 2016, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four rocketed up the best-seller charts, especially after Trump spokesperson Kellyanne Conway coined the phrase 'alternative facts' to defend false claims the Trump administration made about the supposedly high turnout for Trump's first inauguration. Last week, the phenomenon was repeated, with a 250% increase in the novel's sales since last week, although this time round, Orwell's dystopia has been eclipsed by Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, sales of which increased by a 'whopping 6,886%' according to CNN. But is it right to connect contemporary events to this particular label? Noah Kasolowsky considers how popular usage can redefine a legacy.






.jpg)























